Pages

Dr Frank N. Furter. How Tim Curry's character impacted upon me.

The Rocky Horror Picture Show is one of the biggest cult films in history despite it's initial lack of success. 
As Reale stated "Although initially a box-office flop, The Rocky Horror Picture Show eventually became a cult hit and is now famous for the extensive audience participation developed by the midnight-movie crowd who provided initial showings of the film with its only audience."

A film is only as good as its audience. A film is one person/two people's ideas transformed into a vision and a piece of art that they assume others will enjoy and love as much as them. Passive viewers that watch mainstream films such as Elf, Annie, Harry Potter, E.T. watch them for their light-hearted humour, storylines and easy-viewing but as soon as films delve into social, political or cultural struggles, complex story-lines, the audience soon becomes narrower. And a solid example of this is The Rocky Horror Picture Show. 

Transvestites, aliens and the power of 'the others' makes those whom are used to power e.g. straight, white, men feel uncomfortable, undermined and intimidated. However, for those 'outsiders', in this context, homosexuals/transvestites, it gives them the power, it makes them equal much to those 'in powers' frustration - it gives me power. In the majority of mainstream media - even in today's society women are perceived as the side-character, the partner in crime. The dominant character is always a white, heterosexual male. Whereas in Rocky Horror - yes it's male but it's not the usual stereotype, there's open queerness, trans-gender roles for both males and females and quite frankly I find this liberating.

Reale states "One ostensibly plausible explanation for Rocky Horror’s continued popularity is that it effectively opened a safe space for audience members to explore queer gender and sexuality."

I am a straight, white female however I do not follow all the gender stereotypes. I am a football fan, I dress in over-sized jumpers and hats, I'd rather go to a dirty rave than cocktails at a fancy bar. But seeing characters such as Frank N. Furter on the big screen - and being adored allows me to realise that there are no set gender boundaries. 

The freedom of exploration, the openness of queerness is something which was not explored as openly in the 70s and still is not wholly accepted today however it has improved. Films like this inspire and encourage people to come out, it gives them the gateway they need to be who they really are. 

Tim Curry's portrayal of Dr Frank N. Furter is admirable and he plays the role perfectly, divulging and enjoying every scene as the alien transvestite. He is careless and proud, making him a role model and icon for queers/transvestites/those whom feel 'different' in society. 

In Rocky Horror, Brad and Janet are the rich, educated, pure couple whom follow cultural stereotypes, but they aren't the ones in the position of power. 

Tickle states "both Brad and Janet are archetypes of what it means in societal norms to be a heterosexual couple. Through exaggerated and hyperbolic performances, they display the ideological representations for their genders. Brad is seen to be the protective and strong male, whereas Janet is the passive and weaker female."

Yet Dr Frank N. Furter defies every single male stereotype there is and is in the position of power displaying that it's acceptable to be different. Rocky Horror requires active fans and participation for it to be appreciated. Deviancy is something which is opposed by popular culture and tastes, hence why in mainstream films/tv shows etc. the bad guy always loses, the 'other' is always the monster. 

Austin summarises the cult films are not "the intent of the filmmaker”, but the result of active fan followings and exhibition within a-typical exhibition routes such as the midnight movie circuit. And with this, there can be no crossover between cult films and mainstream, it is very much one or the other, as it is with social, cultural and political beliefs in society but there can be cross-overs in gender fluidity and power in society. 

Reale, S B. 2012. "Music, Sound and The Moving Image: 'A Sheep in Wolf's Corset: Timbral and Vocal Signifiers of Masculinity in The Rocky Horror Picture/Glee Show'", Liverpool, England. Pg. 138. 
Tickle, V. 2014. "Film Internation: Film Musings", Gotborg, Sweden. Pg. 147-148. 


0

THIS IS ENGLAND.

The word cult has many negative connotations/stereotypes - as does fandoms - so yet again, many people wouldn't realise that they are fans of cult media. There is a stereotype for 'cult fans' according to Austin whom says "The cult veteran is typically young, single and a high school/college student." and due to this stereotyping people may not consider themselves as fans of cult media/members of the group. However, we are surround by and are mass consumers of cult media - especially films/TV shows. 

My object of study this week is the film/TV series - This is England. Shane Meadow's TIE journey starts in 1983 Britain and runs all the way up to 1990. The first film This Is England follows the journey of poor boy Shaun Fields whose Dad died in The Falklands. Shaun gets bullied and has no friends until he meets Woody and Combo. Combo is an extremely racist skinhead whom is very happy to voice his disgust towards immigrants. The film delves into racial affairs, the hatred of Maggie Thatcher and the loss of innocence. The film has no boundaries and strong racial abuse is used which is very uncomfortable to watch to some extents. 

It also has no boundaries when it comes to sexism/vulnerability of women. The key female figure, Lol (Vicky McClure) is seen to be strong and independent in the first film. Yet in the TV spin-offs TIE 86 you learn that she has cheated on her boyfriend with his best friend. Then in 88, you learn about her abusive childhood. She was raped by her father when she was younger and in the TV series he attempts to abuse her again however she accidentally murders him. Yet, she does not take the blame for her father's death, the strong, independent, male, leader figure Combo does. He serves time in prison for this murder as he loves Lol. Lol is then guilt-ridden and attempts to commit suicide as she can't live with the guilt. This rollercoaster shows how once women have power/control they cannot deal with it, they are still, vulnerable, scared and irresponsible deep down. Turnbull (p. 24) stated "women have the power which they give it to men for them to control" reinforcing the stereotype of women being irresponsible. However, Lol deals with a lot of pain, anger and abuse and still manages to live her life as a single parent, I admire her for this as I too can relate to the feeling of victimisation. She is strong, empowering and independent and defies numerous female stereotypes - as do I. As mentioned in another post, I identify as a skinhead but don't always display it in my appearance however at times I do dress in a skinhead fashion. 

In TIE, the male characters are determined to have power over the female characters but in addition they fight for power amongst themselves. Before Combo is released from prison it is blatant that Woody is the 'leader' and Lol & Milky are below him then Pukey, Gadget etc. however once Combo returns the whole dynamics of the group change. Especially towards Milky. As Reeves Sanday (p.35) says "They (men) go to extraordinary lengths to acquire some of the power for themselves so that they will not be impotent when it's time to fight." and due to the racial divide this requirement to "fight" is very much blatant due to the differences in skin colour. 



The films initially begin very dark in the sense of racism and extremely hard hitting however as they transition from 86-90 the racial issues and differences become less important, it's more about the journey of the characters. 


The film/TV series is viewed as a 'cult' film/show to me due to the audience it appeals to which is very limited and it inspires people to look and present themselves as skinheads/rudeboys. Meadows changes the 'victim' from Milky (racism) to Lol (sexism), the white males remain dominant leaders who fight amongst themselves for power but Milky/Lol don't threaten this power at all, they understand their position/role and follow rather than lead. These messages are told in various other films/TV shows however, This is England is very much: realistic, relatable and hard-hitting and recreates various social and political issues in Britain during the 80s and 90s. 


Austin, B. (2008) ‘Portrait of a cult film audience: The Rocky Horror Picture Show’. In Mathijs, E. and Mendik, X. The Cult Film Reader. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Reeves Sanday, P. (1981) "Female Power and Male Dominance: On the Origins of Sexual Inequality". Cambridge University Press. (quoted Turnbull from here too)




0

Sass, Class - I'm in love with Chuck Bass.

It takes a lot to admit that you're in love with a celebrity - let alone a fictional character. The reasoning as to why it is a struggle to admit this to not only yourself but others too is because it fulfils every single stereotype that people have of 'fans'. 
As Jensen states "These assumptions – about alienation, atomization, vulnerability and irrationality – are central aspects of twentieth-century beliefs about modernity." and they are. The majority of people fear admitting that they are fans of TV shows, bands, actors etc. due to all the negative connotations and before I started studying this module I feared that too due to the negative connotations, criticisms and exaggerated stereotypes. However, I have learnt that there are various different levels of obsession and different types of fans and there are people who are quite frankly, mentally unstable but this isn't due to being a fan. They were already unstable and happened to attach themselves to a fandom etc. and then it developed and got out of control. Jensen quotes Horton and Wohl whom believe "the fan, unable to consummate his desired social relations ‘normally,’ seeks celebrity contact in the hope of gaining the prestige and influence he or she psychologically needs, but cannot achieve in anonymous, fragmented modern society." (16) which breaks down into claiming that fans become that obsessed, infatuated and crazed by the love and adoration for a celebrity and this results in fans wanting to meet their idols. This attachment to a celebrity is apparently due to their exclusion from society but I argue this case. As I've stated in my title, I am 'in love' with Gossip Girl's rich bad boy, Chuck Bass whom is played by Ed Westwick. 


The word 'love' in this context does not connote that I want to meet him, marry him or spawn his lovechild, I simply am infatuated by his persona, looks and behaviour. This does not mean I am sitting at home with posters of him sprawled over my walls, I don't go to A-List events and camp outside for four days nor do I have a tattoo of his face on my back. I simply enjoy watching Ed's portrayal of Chuck Bass. His sex appeal is high, his charm does reach out to the viewer and entice the viewers. There are numerous forums devoted to the character whom obsess over the character but this doesn't mean that fans are going to find him and throw their panties at him. 
Here's an example of a forum:

Nobody on this forum has stated that they want his kids, want to marry him or even meet him. They just enjoy appreciating and talking about a character which they have grown attachment to. I'm not afraid to say that I cried when Chuck and Blair almost died in a car crash, or when they got married because quite frankly, I'd cry if my friends were in a crash, or got married so why is it so wrong to cry at a programme? They are made to be realistic, the whole purpose of a programme is to entertain - so why is it such an issue for people to enjoy, embrace and discuss the things we watch? 
Why is it wrong to be attracted to another human being?

IT ISN'T!!!! IT'S HUMAN NATURE PEOPLE. 
If he walked past me in the street, famous or not I'd go to my friends 'oh he's nice isn't he?" so why are celebrities immune to being attractive? 

I completely agree with Jensen whom sums up my view completely "Would I claim to be ‘in love’ with any of these individuals, would I offer to die for any of these preferences? Not likely, and certainly not in public. I would lose the respect of my peers." (22) the whole reason people don't express their likes and interests is due to the fear of losing respect from peers, hence why I struggle to write these blog posts. This fear is due to all the negative stereotypes mentioned above, stereotypes that are wrong and over-exaggerated. Any how, Chuck Bass is the man I would love to have as a partner, there's nothing wrong with having standards that you wish someone would adhere to, is there?

Jensen, J. (1992) ‘Fandom as Pathology: The Consequences of Characterization’. In Lewis, L. A. (Ed.) The Adoring Audience. London, Routledge, pp9-29.
0

Squeeze & pop, you've hit the spot! Thoughts of a spot-popping fanatic.

This is probably my weirdest and most private 'fandom' that I'm a part of, and that fandom is fans of Dr Pimple Popper. Dr. Sandra Lee is a certified dermatologist from America who films and posts videos of her professionally popping people's cysts, blackheads, lipomas, dilated pore winers etc. Those words probably don't mean anything to most readers whom don't have any knowledge in dermatology. There are a variety of different "pimples" that the professional spot-popper has to tackle and remove which require different procedures. Sadly, no, I'm not a medical student so I have learnt all this vocabulary and the difference in these spots by simply binge-watching her videos which can very much be seen as "sad" and "weird", as William Shatner told his Trekkie's on the Saturday Night Live "move out of your [their] parent’s basements and to proceed with adult experiences" (10). This misconception of fans being social outcasts, recluses and obsessive weirdos who have no aspirations in live is very patronising, disrespectful and quite frankly, wrong. It's just a hobby/passion, just like playing Minecraft or going to knitting club - it's something people choose to do in their spare time. Watching videos of Dr Sandra Lee popping lipomas isn't going to turn me into a recluse or make me "emotionally unstable, socially maladjusted, and dangerously out of sync with reality" as quoted from a newspaper by Jenkins (13). Understandably, yes there are obsessive fans whom are driven to insane actions such as murder (John Lennon) but this isn't due to them being a fan. 

The stereotypes and assumptions of being a 'fan' do have very unrealistic and extreme connotations as Jenkins states (17) "Significantly, if the comic fan and the psychotic fan are usually portrayed as masculine, although frequently as de-gendered, asexual, or impotent, the eroticized fan is almost always female... the feminine side of fandom is manifested in the images of screaming teenage girls who try to tear the clothes off the Beatles or who faint at the touch of one of Elvis’s sweat-drenched scarfs, or the groupie servicing the stars backstage after the concert in rockamentaries and porn videos." 
This stereotype suggests that female 'fans' are all sex-crazed women who pleasure themselves over their idols, if this stereotype rings true this suggests that I pleasure myself over watching spot-popping videos and Dr Sandra Lee, I'm an outcast and will one day end up trying to murder my "idol". 
No. 
I enjoy watching these videos as they make me feel clean. As Shove states "Concepts of what's right and proper are unavoidable when thinking about how cleaning practices come to be as they are and how it is that weekly patterns of bathing and laundering have turned into daily routines." (79) and these videos make me appreciate my cleanliness, cleaning routines and practices. This may appear to resemble OCD however it isn't that I spend countless hours bleaching my floor and surfaces at home, I don't. But washing and being physically clean is something essential to me as I do fear waking up to find a cyst on my back. Despite this, I enjoy seeing that these spots are treatable. Due to my 'obsession' with personal hygiene I do have to pop my own spots - and peers as if I don't then it makes me feel dirty. 
Reading this back it may seem obsessive and peculiar but I didn't realise it was wrong to want to be clean?

If you're interested in learning the difference between a dialated pore winer, cyst, lipoma and blackheads then click the links below:

Blackhead
Lipoma
Cyst (the worst ones to watch)
Dilated Pore Winer (fave)

‘“Get a Life!” Fans, Poachers, Nomads” in Jenkins, H. (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge

"Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality (New Technologies / New Cultures)" in Shove, E. (2003) Introducing Cleanliness: Morality, Technology and Practice." Berg Publishers. 
0

RUDEBOYS RUDEBOYS! (i'm not a boy but okay)

Being a fan of something is a common occurrence nowadays however people don't understand how significant their fandom is, or even that they are part of one. I am part of the rudeboy fandom and The Specials are one of my favourite bands however I didn't realise this until I studied this course. People won't class themselves as being members of a fandom because of all the negative connotations that come with it, as expressed perfectly in People's Weekly (sourced from J.Jensen: 10)  "We’ve given the losers in life or sex a rare chance to express their dominance.' calling people who are fans 'losers' does automatically create a sense of exclusion and segregation within friendships, families, communities, workplaces etc. as Jensen states (9) 'Once fans are characterized as deviant, they can be treated as disreputable, even dangerous ‘others.’ and this fear and ostracisation of fans does create fragmented communities in wider society. However, it also helps create sub-communities and various sub-cultures. 

As said by Phill Jupitus in Horace Panter's book 'Ska'd for Life: A Personal Journey with The Specials' "To say The Specials changed how I looked at music would be an understatement." and I completely agree. The political messages, catchy rocksteady beats and bounds of energy that come from their music is enticing, there's nobody else out there like it. When you see them live you really do feel part of a community and it makes you proud to be a fan of such an amazing band. The beauty of being a part of this fandom is the variation in ages of the fans, there's 50 year old men standing next to 19 year old girls, all dressed in their Fred Perry polo's, Levi jeans and Dr Martens'. That's another thing that comes with the fandom, the fashion. It helps you identify other 'moon stompers' and 'rude boys' in public and so that you can acknowledge and identify with each other with a simple look. There's no hierarchy in the sense of a divide between older and younger fans, everyone is simply one big family. The rocksteady/ska movement - especially The Specials, helped break down many political and social barriers, specifically racist and sexist barriers e.g. in 1981 The Specials and Hazel O'Connor played a concert called "Peaceful Protest Against Racism" after a Sikh man was killed in Coventry by a gang of neo-nazi skinheads. These acts of defiance helped destroy barriers and help unify fragmented communities which is extremely admirable and significant for our local community as the band are Coventry born & raised. I am very proud to say I am a Specials fan and to be a part of such a loving fanbase. 
  


Jensen, J. (1992) ‘Fandom as Pathology: The Consequences of Characterization’. In Lewis, L. A. (Ed.) The Adoring Audience. London, Routledge, pp9-29.
Panter, H. (2008) 'Ska'd for Life: A Personal Journey with The Specials", Pan. (Foreword not in actual book).

0

copyright © . all rights reserved. designed by Color and Code

grid layout coding by helpblogger.com